verify-ui-change

Tests that changes to a web app actually work by running the real page and checking the result.

Installation
Run `npx skills add "https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle" --skill "verify-ui-change"` to install this skill, then follow its SKILL.md instructions for my next request.

Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor, or any agent that can run commands.

SKILL.mdShow the author's original SKILL.md
---
name: verify-ui-change
description: Check that a change to a web app actually works in the running app before calling it done. Drives the real page and returns a pass/fail verdict with the request that fired, the state that moved, and the file:line to fix. Use after editing a component, a form, a route, or an API call; when you have said "fixed" but have not opened the app; when the user asks "does it actually work?"; or when a change looks right on screen and you cannot prove it.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  version: 2.13.1
  homepage: https://www.reticle.sh
  repository: https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle
---

# Verify the change in the running app

You edited something a user can see. Nothing is proven until the real app has done it and something other than the DOM agrees.

This uses **Reticle**, which embeds a dev-only SDK in the user's running app and exposes it as `reticle_*` MCP tools. No screenshots, no browser download for the verify loop, no dev server of its own.

## 1. Are the tools here?

```
reticle_sessions()
```

- **A session comes back** → go to step 2.
- **Tools do not exist** → Reticle is not installed. Run `RETICLE_INSTALL_SOURCE=npx_skill npx @reticlehq/server@latest init`, then keep going without the tools: fix every `⚠` it printed, start the project's own dev script in the background if nothing is serving the app, and open it with `npx @reticlehq/server open <the url the dev server is serving>`. Only once the app is running and connected, ask for the one thing you cannot do yourself: a client restart, so it picks up the MCP server. Stopping at the `init` command leaves the user with config files and an uninstrumented page. Full setup is in the [`install-and-verify`](https://github.com/reticlehq/reticle/blob/main/skills/install-and-verify/SKILL.md) skill.
- **Tools exist, list is empty** → read the `why` field on the response. It distinguishes "no app running" from "an app is running that never dialled this daemon" from "a tab was here and closed", and each has a different fix. If no app is running, start the project's own dev script from `package.json` in the background yourself and tell the user in one line that it is running and how to stop it: never a second one, never a guessed command, never kill anything, and the permission prompt is your host's. If one IS running, the app is not the missing piece and the SDK is; do not send the user to start what they already started.

## 2. Name the consequence BEFORE you act

This is the whole method. An expectation written after you see the result can be talked into agreeing with whatever happened; one written before cannot.

```
reticle_snapshot({ sessionId, mode: "interactive" })   // controls only, with refs

reticle_act_and_wait({ sessionId, ref, action: "click", until: { kind: "allOf", predicates: [
  { kind: "net",     method: "POST", urlContains: "/api/...", status: 200 },
  { kind: "element", query: { testid: "..." } },
  { kind: "console", level: "error", absent: true },
]}})
```

Multi-step journey? Drive it in one call with `reticle_act_sequence`, then assert the outcome once. Do not act → snapshot → act → snapshot: it proves the same thing at several times the cost.

**Only `reticle_act_and_wait` and `reticle_assert` produce a verdict.** `reticle_act`, `snapshot`, `query`, `navigate`, `network` and `console` move or read the app and prove nothing. A drive that ends without one of the first two has no result, however many calls it made.

## 3. Read the verdict honestly

| `verified` | means | do |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `yes` | the consequence you named happened | report it, with the evidence |
| `no` | it did not happen, or a channel contradicted the UI | a real finding: report it with `because` |
| `unknown` | Reticle drove the app and could not tell | **not a pass.** Say unknown and say why |

On `unknown` / `unsettled`, re-assert rather than re-driving: `reticle_assert({ predicate, since, timeout_ms: 8000 })` using the `since` from the act result. Re-driving repeats a side effect that already happened.

**Never weaken a check to turn a verdict green.** An assertion edited until it passes proves nothing.

## 4. Check what you did not touch

```
reticle_run({ tool: "reticle_verify", sessionId, args: { action: "coverage" } })   // { total, exercised, untouched }
```

If `untouched` still holds controls your change affects, the drive is unfinished. One call, and it is the cheapest guard against reporting a pass over the half you never opened.

## 5. Report

State what you drove, what the verdict was, and the evidence: the request and status, the state that changed, the app's own signal. If something failed, `reticle_inspect({ sessionId, ref })` on the failing element gives the `file:line`: put it in the report.

Then `reticle_session({ action: "yield", mode: "waiting" })` so the human's panel stops reading "live".

---

More detail, fetchable one page at a time: `curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt` for the index, then the single page you need (`tools-act-and-wait.md`, `predicates.md`, `troubleshooting.md`). If Reticle itself misbehaves, file it with `reticle_feedback`: one call, then carry on.

Mirrored from the author's public source. Install counts from the open skills registry.

The systems behind these skills get built for partners every week.

Partner with us